10,000 BC: Review

I am not even going to give this crap the recognition as a movie. In fact, it doesn't even deserve an image. No, it's not a movie. It's more a waste of time than staring at the sun for an hour. More a waste of your time than wasting your time. There are so many things I utterly hated about 10,000 BC that I'm actually not even going to get into it. The script is so bad not even Al Pacino could make it worthwhile. Denzel Washington couldn't save this horribly written script. It's a wonder they got any actors at all, but considering how highly publicized it had been lately, I expected just a little more than I got. From the creator of Day After  Tomorrow (a mediocre movie with at least above average visual effects) I was hoping for at least some up-to-date SFX. Not a single digitally created animal felt even the slightest of real to me. I won't even get into the killer ostriches. Hey, I have an idea. Let's take ancient Egypt and transform it into a historic piece of garbage. I almost recommend you go to 10,000 BC simply so you can see how NEVER to make a movie. How bad is it? In one sentence:

I have to watch 5 Best Picture winners consecutively in order to get the awful taste of 10,000 BC out of my mouth.


                                        zero out of 5 trophies.


 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 3/22/2008 11:48 PM Chris wrote:
    This movie was just terrible. The acting was bad, the CGI was lame, the script was weak. There just wasn't anything memorable about this at all. I had very low expectations going in, and they weren't even close to being met.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.